Strategic Planning in the Public Sector (2023)

  • Ackermann, F., & Eden, C. (2011). Making strategy: Mapping out strategic success. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.

  • Albrechts, L., & Balducci, A. (2013). Practicing strategic planning: In search of critical features to explain the strategic character of plans. disP—The Planning Review, 49(3), 16–27.

  • Albrechts, L., Balducci, A., & Hillier, J. (Eds.). (2016). Situated practices of strategic planning. New York: Routledge.

  • Allison, G. (1971). Essence of decision: Explaining the Cuban Missile Crisis. Boston: Little, Brown.

  • Andrews, K. (1980). The concept of corporate strategy (Rev. ed.). Homewood, IL: R. D. Irwin.

  • Andrews, R., Boyne, G. A., Law, J., & Walker, R. M. (2009). Strategy formulation, strategy content, and performance. Public Management Review, 11(1), 1–22.

  • Andrews, R., Boyne, G. A., Law, J., & Walker, R. M. (2012). Strategic management and public service performance. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

  • Andrews, R., Boyne, G. A., & Walker, R. M. (2006). Strategy content and organizational performance: An empirical analysis. Public Administration Review, 66(1), 52–63.

  • Balducci, A., Fedeli, V., & Pasqui, G. (2011). Strategic planning for contemporary urban regions. Burlington, VT: Ashgate.

  • Barzelay, M., & Campbell, C. (2003). Preparing for the future: Strategic planning in the U. S. air force. Washington DC: Brookings Institution Press.

  • Barzelay, M., & Jacobsen, A. S. (2009). Theorizing implementation of public management policy reforms: A case study of strategic planning and programming in the European Commission. Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration, and Institutions, 22(2), 319–334.

  • Beck Jorgensen, T., & Bozeman, B. (2007). Public values: An inventory. Administration and Society, 39(3), 354–381.

  • Behn, R. D. (1988). Management by groping along. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 7(4), 643–663.

  • Berry, F. S., & Wechsler, B. (1995). State agencies’ experience with strategic planning: Findings from a national survey. Public Administration Review, 54(4), 322–330.

  • Bingham, L. B., Nabatchi, T., & O’Leary, R. (2005). The new governance: Practices and processes for stakeholder and citizen participation in the work of government. Public Administration Review, 65(5), 547–558.

  • Blair, R. (2004). Public participation and community development: The role of strategic planning. Public Administration Quarterly, 28(1–2), 102–147.

  • Borins, S. (1998). Lessons from the new public management in commonwealth nations. International Public Management Journal, 1(1), 37–58.

  • Borins, S. (2014). The persistence of innovation in government. Washington, DC: Brookings.

  • Bovaird, T. (2007). Beyond engagement and participation: User and community co-production of public services. Public Administration Review, 67(5), 846–860.

  • Bower, J., Barlett, C., Chrisensen, C., & Pearson, J. (1991). Business policy: Texts and cases. Homewood, IL: Irwin.

  • Boyne, G. A., & Gould-Williams, J. S. (2003). Planning and performance in public organizations. Public Management Review, 5(1), 115–132.

  • Boyne, G. A., Gould-Williams, J. S., Law, J., & Walker, R. M. (2004). Problems of rational planning in public organizations. Administration and Society, 36(3), 328–350.

  • Brody, S. D., Godschalk, D. R., & Burby, R. J. (2003). Mandating citizen participation in plan making: Six strategic planning choices. Journal of the American Planning Association, 69(3), 245–264.

  • Bryson, J. M. (2002). Strategic planning for public and nonprofit purposes. In N. Smelser (Ed.), International encyclopedia of the behavioral and social sciences (pp. 15, 145–115, 151). Oxford: Pergamon.

  • Bryson, J. M. (2010). The future of public and nonprofit strategic planning in the United States. Public Administration Review, 70(s1), s255–s267.

  • Bryson, J. M. (2011). Strategic planning for public and nonprofit organizations. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    (Video) Strategic Planning for the Public Sector

  • Bryson, J. M. (2015). Strategic planning for public and nonprofit organizations. In J. D. Wright (Ed.), International encyclopedia of the social and behavioral sciences (2d ed., pp. 515–521). Oxford: Elsevier.

  • Bryson, J. M., Berry, F. S., & Yang, K. (2010). The state of strategic management research: A selective literature review and set of future directions. American Review of Public Administration, 40(5), 495–521.

  • Bryson, J. M., & Bromiley, P. (1993). Critical factors affecting the planning and implementation of major projects. Strategic Management Journal, 14(5), 319–337.

  • Bryson, J. M., Cunningham, G. L., & Lokkesmoe, K. J. (2002). What to do when stakeholders matter: The case of problem formulation for the African American Men Project of Hennepin County, Minnesota, Public Administration Review, 62(5), 568–584.

  • Bryson, J. M., Crosby, B. C., & Bryson, J. K. (2009). Understanding strategic planning and the formulation and implementation of strategic plans as a way of knowing: The contributions of actor-network theory. International Public Management Journal, 12(2), 172–207.

  • Bryson, J. M., Crosby, B. C., & Stone, M. M. (2015). Designing and implementing cross-sector collaboration—needed and challenging. Public Administration Review, 75(5), 647–663.

  • Bryson, J. M., & Roering, W. D. (1987). Applying private-sector strategic planning in the public sector. Journal of the American Planning Association, 53(1), 9–22.

  • Bryson, J. M., & Slotterback, C. S. (2016). Strategic spatial planning in the USA. In L. Albrechts, A. Balducci, & J. Hillier (Eds.), Situated practices of strategic planning. New York: Routledge.

  • Buckwalter, N. D. (2014). The potential for public empowerment through government-organized participation. Public Administration Review, 74(5), 573–584.

  • Burby, R. J. (2003). Making plans that matter: Citizen involvement and government action. Journal of the American Planning Association, 69(1), 33–49.

  • Chakraborty, A., Kaza, N., Knaap, G., & Deal, B. (2011). Robust plans and contingent plans. Journal of the American Planning Association, 77(3), 251–266.

  • Christensen, K. S. (1999). Cities and complexity. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.

  • Christensen, T., & Lægreid, P. (2007). The whole-of-government approach to public sector reform. Public Administration Review, 67(6), 1059–1066.

  • Clarke, A., & Fuller, M. (2010). Collaborative strategic management: Strategy formulation and implementation by multi-organizational cross-sector social partnerships. Journal of Business Ethics, 94(1), 85–101.

  • Conroy, M. M., & Berke, P. R. (2004). What makes a good sustainable development plan? An analysis of factors that influence principles of sustainable development. Environment and Planning A, 36(8), 1381–1396.

  • Cook, M., & Harrison, T. M. (2015). Using public value thinking for government IT planning and decision making: A case study. Information Polity, 20(2–3), 183–197.

  • Deyle, R., & Wiedenman, R. E. (2014). Collaborative planning by metropolitan planning organizations: A test of a causal theory. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 34(3), 257–275.

  • DiMaggio P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–160.

  • Donald, C. G., Lyons, T. S., & Tribbey, R. C. (2001). A partnership for strategic planning and management in a public organization. Public Performance and Management Review, 25(2), 176–193.

  • Eadie, D. C. (1983). Putting a powerful tool to practical us: The application of strategic planning in the public sector. Public Administration Review, 43(5), 447–452.

  • Edelenbos, J., & Klijn, E.-H. (2005). Managing stakeholder involvement in decision making: A comparative analysis of six interactive processes in the Netherlands. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 16, 417–446.

  • Elbanna, S., Andrews, R., & Pollanen, R. (2016). Strategic planning and implementation success in public service organizations. Public Management Review, 18(7), 1017–1042.

  • Emerson, K., & Nabatchi, T. (2015). Evaluating the productivity of collaborative governance regimes. Public Performance and Management Review, 38(4), 717–747.

  • Fairhurst, G. T. (2011). The power of framing. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

  • Favoreu, C., Carassus, D., Gardey, D, & Maurel, C. (2015). Performance management in the local public sector in France: An administrative rather than a political model. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 81(4), 672–693.

  • Feldman, M. S., & Pentland, B. T. (2008). Routine dynamics. In D. Barry & H. Hansen (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of new approaches in management and organization. London: SAGE.

    (Video) GMGA3073 Strategic Management In Public Sector (strategic planning)

  • Ferlie, E., & Ongaro, E. (2015). Strategic management in public sector organizations: Concepts, schools, and contemporary issues. New York: Routledge.

  • Freedman, L. (2013). Strategy: A history. New York: Oxford University Press.

  • Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Boston: Pittman Publishing.

  • Friend, J., & Hickling, A. (2005). Planning under pressure: The strategic choice approach (3d ed.). Oxford: Heinemann.

  • George, B., & Desmidt, S. (2014). A state of research on strategic management in the public sector. In P. Joyce & A. Drumaux (Eds.), Strategic management in public organizations: European practices and perspectives (pp. 151–172). New York: Routledge.

  • Gilmour, J. B., & Lewis, D. E. (2006). Assessing performance budgeting at OMB: The influence of politics, performance, and program size. Journal of Public Administration and Theory, 16(2), 169–186.

  • Gomes, R. C., Liddle, J., & Gomes, L. O. M. (2010). A five-sided model of stakeholder influence: A cross-national analysis of decision making in local government. Public Management Review, 12(5), 701–724.

  • Gray, B., Purdy, J. M., & Ansani, S. S. (2015). From interactions to institutions: Microprocesses of framing and mechanisms for the structuring of institutional fields. Academy of Management Review, 40(1), 115–148.

  • Hansen, J. R., & Ferlie, E. (2016). Applying strategic management theories in public sector organizations: Developing a typology. Public Management Review, 18(1), 1–19.

  • Helling, A. (1998). Collaborative visioning: Proceed with caution! Evaluating the results of Atlanta’s Vision 2020 project. Journal of the American Planning Association, 64(3), 335–349.

  • Hendrick, R. (2003). Strategic planning environment, process, and performance in public agencies: A comparative study of departments in Milwaukee. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 13(4), 491–519.

  • Huxham, C., & Vangen, S. (2005). Managing to collaborate. New York: Routledge.

  • Ingman, D., Kersten, J., & Brymer, T. (2002). Strategic planning that uses an integrated approach. Public Management, 84(4), 16–18.

  • Innes, J. E. (1996). Planning through consensus building: A new view of the comprehensive planning ideal. Journal of the American Planning Association, 62(4), 460–472.

  • Innes, J. E., & Booher, D. (2010). Planning with complexity: An introduction to collaborative rationality. New York: Routledge.

  • Jimenez, B. S. (2013). Strategic planning and the fiscal performance of city governments during the great recession. American Review of Public Administration, 43(5), 581–601.

  • Joyce, P., & Drumaux, A. (Eds.). (2014). Strategic management in public organizations: European practices and perspectives. New York: Routledge.

  • Kaufman, J. L., & Jacobs, H. M. (1987). A planning perspective on strategic planning. Journal of American Planning Association, 53(1), 23–33.

  • Kettl, D. J. (2013). Politics of the administrative process (6th ed.). Washington, DC: CQ Press.

  • Kissler, G. R., Fore, K. N., Jacobson, W. S., & Kittredge, W. P. (1998). State strategic planning: Suggestions from the Oregon experience. Public Administration Review, 58(4), 353–359.

  • Latham, G. P. (2004). The motivational benefits of goal-setting. Academy of Management Executive (1993–2005), 18(4), 126–129.

  • Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social. New York: Oxford University Press.

  • Legacy, C. (2012). Achieving legitimacy through deliberative plan-making processes—Lessons for metropolitan strategic planning. Planning Theory and Practice, 13(1), 71–87.

  • Light, P. C. (1998). Tides of reform. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

  • Loh, C. G. (2012). Four potential disconnects in the community planning process. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 31(1), 33–47.

  • Mayntz, R. (2004). Mechanisms in the analysis of social macro-phenomena. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 34(2). 237–259.

    (Video) The Future of Strategic Planning in the Public Sector

  • McKinnon, R. (2010). An ageing workforce and strategic human resource management: Staffing challenges for social security administrations the ageing of social security administration workforces. International Social Security Review, 63(3–4), 91–113.

  • Meier, K. J., O’Toole, L. J. Jr., Boyne, G. A., & Walker, R. M. (2007). Strategic management and the performance of public organizations. Testing venerable ideas against recent theories. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 17(1), 357–377.

  • Mintzberg, H. (1994). The fall and rise of strategic planning. Harvard Business Review, 72(1), 107–114.

  • Mintzberg, H., Ahlstrand, B., & Lampel, J. (2009). Strategy safari (2d ed.). Philadelphia: Trans-Atlantic Publications.

  • Mintzberg, H., & Water, J. (1985). On strategies: Deliberate and emergent. Strategic Management Journal, 6, 257–272.

  • Mohr, L. (1982). Explaining organizational behavior. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

  • Moynihan, D. P. (2006). Managing for results in state government: Evaluating a decade of reform. Public Administration Review, 66(1), 77–89.

  • Moynihan, D. P. (2013). The new federal performance management system: Implementing the Government Performance Modernization Act. Washington, DC: IBM Center for the Business of Government.

  • Moynihan, D. P., & Kroll, A. (2016). Performance management routines that work? An early assessment of the GPRA Modernization Act. Public Administration Review, 76(2), 314–323.

  • Moynihan, D. P., Pandey, S. K., & Wright, B. E. (2013). Transformational leadership in the public sector: Empirical evidence of its effects. In Y. K. Dwivedi, M. A. Shareef, S. K. Pandey, & V. Kumar (Eds.), Public administration reformation: Market demand from public organizations (pp. 87–104). New York: Routledge.

  • Neshkova, M. I., & Guo, H. (2012). Public participation and organizational performance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 22, 267–288.

  • Nutt, P. C., & Backoff, R. W. (1992). Strategic management of public and third sector organizations: A handbook for leaders. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

  • Nutt, P. C., & Backoff, R. W. (1993). Organizational publicness and its implications for strategic management. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 3(2), 209–231.

  • Osborne, S. P., & Brown, L. (2012). Managing public-sector innovation (2d ed.). London: Routledge.

  • Patton, M. Q. (2011). Developmental evaluation. New York: Guildford.

  • Percoco, M. (2016). Strategic planning and institutional collective action in Italian cities. Public Management Review, 18(1), 139–158.

  • Page, S. B., Stone, M. M., Bryson, J. M., & Crosby, B. C. (2015). Public value creation by cross-sector collaborations: A theory and challenges of assessment. Public Administration, 93(3), 715–732.

  • Pettigrew, A. (1973). The politics of organizational decision making. London: Tavistock.

  • Pfeffer, J., & Sutton, R. I. (2006). Hard facts, dangerous half-truths, and total nonsense: Profiting from evidence-based management. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

  • Poister, T. H. (2003). Measuring performance in public and nonprofit organizations. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

  • Poister, T. H. (2005). Strategic planning and management in state departments of public transportation. International Journal of Public Administration, 28(13–14), 1035–1056.

  • Poister, T. H. (2010). The future of strategic planning in the public sector: Linking strategic management and performance. Public Administration Review, 70(s1), s246–s254.

  • Poister, T. H., Edwards, L. H., & Pasha, O. (2013). The impact of strategic planning on organizational outcomes. Public Performance and Management Review, 36(4), 585–615.

  • Poister, T. H., Pitts, D., & Edwards, L. H. (2010). Strategic management research in the public sector: Synthesis, assessment, and future directions. American Review of Public Administration, 40(4), 522–545.

  • Poister, T. H., & Streib, G. (1994). Municipal management tools from 1976–1993: An overview and update. Public Productivity and Management Review, 18(2), 115–125.

    (Video) How to Build Successful Public Sector Strategies |Planning and Strategy Management| Dubai | Meirc

  • Poister, T. H., & Streib, G. (1999). Strategic management in the public sector: Concepts, models, and processes. Public Productivity and Management Review, 22(3), 308–325.

  • Poister, T. H., & Streib, G. (2005). Elements of strategic planning and management in municipal government: Status after two decades. Public Administration Review, 65(1), 45–56.

  • Poister, T. H., Thomas, J. C., & Berryman, A. F. (2013). Reaching out to stakeholders; The Georgia DOT 360-degree assessment model. Public Performance and Management Review, 37(2), 301–328.

  • Pollitt, C., & Bouckaert, G. (2011). Public management reform: A comparative analysis; New public management, governance, and the neo-Weberian state. New York: Oxford University Press.

  • Porter, M. (1998). Competitive advantage: Creating and sustaining superior performance. New York: Free Press.

  • Quinn, J. B. (1978). Strategic change: “Logical incremenaltism.” Sloan Management Review, 20(1), 7–21.

  • Quinn, J. B. (1980). Strategies for change: Logical incrementalism. Homewood, IL: Richard D. Irwin.

  • Quinn, J. B. (1982). Managing strategies incrementally. International Journal of Management Science, 10(6), 613–627.

  • Radin, B. A. (2006). Challenging the performance movement: Accountability, complexity and democratic values. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.

  • Roberts, N. (2000). The synoptic model of strategic planning and the GPRA: Lacking a good fit with the political context. Public Productivity and Management Review, 23(3), 297–311.

  • Sandfort, J., & Moulton, S. (2015). Effective implementation in practice: Integrating public policy and management. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

  • Streib, G., & Poister, T. H. (1990). Strategic planning in U.S. cities: Patterns of use, perceptions of effectiveness, and an assessment of strategic capacity. American Review of Public Administration, 20(1), 29–44.

  • Talbot, C. (2010). Theories of performance; organizational and service improvement in the public domain. New York: Oxford University Press.

  • Tama, J. (2015). The politics of strategy: Why government agencies conduct major strategic reviews. Journal of Public Policy, 37(1), 27–54.

  • Thomas, J. C. (1995). Public participation in decision making: New skills and strategies for public managers. San Francisco: John Wiley.

  • Ugboro, I. O., Obeng, K., & Spann, O. (2010). Strategic planning as an effective tool of strategic management in public sector organizations: Evidence from public transit organizations. Administration and Society, 43(1), 87–123.

  • Van de Ven, A. H. (2007). Engaged scholarship: A guide for organizational and social research. New York: Oxford University Press.

  • Vidyarthi, S., Hoch, C., & Basmajian, C. (2013). Making sense of India’s spatial plan-making practice: Enduring approach or emergent variations. Planning Theory and Practice, 14(1), 57–74.

  • Vigar, G. (2006). Deliberation, participation, and learning in the development of regional strategies: Transport policy making in North East England. Planning Theory and Practice, 7(3), 267–287.

  • Vining, A. R. (2011). Public agency external analysis using a modified “five forces” framework. International Public Management Journal, 14(1), 63–105.

  • Walker, R. M., Andrews, R., Boyne, G. A., Meier, K. J., & O’Toole, L. J. (2010). Wakeup call: Strategic management, network alarms, and performance. Public Administration Review, 70(5), 731–741.

  • Wheeland, C. M. (1993). Citywide strategic planning: An evaluation of Rock Hill’s empowering vision. Public Administration Review, 53(1), 65–72.

  • Wheeland, C. M. (2004). Empowering the vision: Community-wide strategic planning in Rock Hill, South Carolina. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.

FAQs

What is strategic planning in the public sector? ›

Strategic Planning is a means to an end, a method used to position an organiza- tion, through prioritizing its use of resources according to identified goals, in an effort to guide its direction and development over a period of time.

What is strategic planning in public administration? ›

Strategic planning is a process in which an organization's leaders define their vision for the future and identify their organization's goals and objectives. The process includes establishing the sequence in which those goals should be realized so that the organization can reach its stated vision.

Why is strategy important in the public sector? ›

Strategy in the Public Sector provides guidance to managers who have responsibility for delivering increased levels of efficiency and innovation and accountability. It shows how strategic changes can be made through realigning and increasing the capacity of the public sector organisation.

How do you create a strategic plan for the government? ›

How to Strategic Plan in 7 Steps
  1. Step 1: Environmental Scan. ...
  2. Step 2: Internal Analysis. ...
  3. Step 3: Strategic Direction. ...
  4. Step 4: Develop Goals and Objectives. ...
  5. Step 5: Define Metrics, Set Timelines, and Track Progress. ...
  6. Step 6: Write and Publish a Strategic Plan. ...
  7. Step 7: Plan for Implementation and the Future.
26 Apr 2022

What are the four steps in strategic planning? ›

The 4 Steps of Strategic Planning Process
  1. Environmental Scanning. Environmental scanning is the process of gathering, organizing and analyzing information. ...
  2. Strategy Formulation. ...
  3. Strategy Implementation. ...
  4. Strategy Evaluation.
4 Mar 2021

What are the 7 elements of strategic planning? ›

Here are the 7 basic elements of a strategic plan: vision, mission, SWOT analysis, core values, goals, objectives, and action plans.

What is an example of strategic planning? ›

One of the most commonly available examples of strategic planning, a corporate strategy is designed to increase revenue and brand reputation. From new products and quality enhancements to aggressive marketing and sales techniques, there are many ways to tap into growth opportunities.

What are the strategic objectives in public sector? ›

At its core, the public sector strategy is to “build a better, sustainable community.” Most of the long-term goals are broad in nature at the community level.

Which categories of strategy are important in the public sector? ›

Stewart (2004) further identifies three strategies that are important in organizations in the public sector. These are strategic policy, organisational strategy and managerial strategies. ...

Why is strategic planning important? ›

Having a strategic plan in place can enable you to track progress toward goals. When each department and team understands your company's larger strategy, their progress can directly impact its success, creating a top-down approach to tracking key performance indicators (KPIs).

What are the benefits of strategic planning? ›

The benefits of strategic planning

Align everyone around a shared purpose. Proactively set objectives to help you get where you want to go. Define long-term goals, and then set shorter-term goals to support them. Assess your current situation and any opportunities—or threats.

What is strategic planning framework? ›

A strategic planning framework outlines how you will conceptually approach your strategic plan. Frameworks tend to be visual and detail the activities that are performed in your organization's strategy plan. Think of the framework as a blueprint or the foundation for your messaging and brand narrative.

What is the most important step in strategic planning? ›

The first and perhaps most important step of the planning process is understanding that there's a need for a plan. In terms of management, this means that you need to be aware of the industry environment in which the business operates so that you can identify opportunities for development.

What skills are needed for strategic planning? ›

Strategic thinking requires research, analytical thinking, innovation, problem-solving skills, communication and leadership skills.
  • Research skills are the ability to find and evaluate useful information related to the project you are working on. ...
  • Analytical skill is a key element to strategic thinking.

What are 5 management strategies? ›

Top management techniques
  • Dole out recognition when it's deserved. ...
  • Make company goals transparent and provide consistent feedback. ...
  • Provide training and career development. ...
  • Troubleshoot problem areas. ...
  • Know when to let someone go.
29 Oct 2021

What are the six major components of strategic planning? ›

Read ahead to learn more about the six vital elements of strategic planning: vision, mission, objectives, strategy, approach, and tactics.

What are the three most important characteristics of strategic planning? ›

Confirm Your Mission, Vision, and Values Statements

There's no better time to create or reaffirm your mission, vision, and values than during the strategic planning process. Mission, vision, and values form the foundation on which you'll build the strategic framework.

What are the 3 elements of strategic planning? ›

Effective strategic planning is a process that should be broken down into three separate, equally important components: strategic thinking, long-range planning, and operational planning.

What is 5 P's strategy examples? ›

They are:
  • Plan.
  • Ploy.
  • Pattern.
  • Position.
  • Perspective.

How many goals should a strategic plan have? ›

Between three and five. By focusing on between three and five, people don't feel overwhelmed with too much to do. It sends a clear and compelling message about what needs to be done most urgently.

Which categories of strategy are important in the public sector? ›

Stewart (2004) further identifies three strategies that are important in organizations in the public sector. These are strategic policy, organisational strategy and managerial strategies. ...

How is strategic planning difference between public sector and private sector organizations? ›

The principal difference between public and private CRE is that in the public sector, financial drivers are typically not the primary focus. Rather, accomplishing the organization's mission—education, justice, transportation or services—is the primary concern and the measure of success.

What is strategic planning importance? ›

Having a strategic plan in place can enable you to track progress toward goals. When each department and team understands your company's larger strategy, their progress can directly impact its success, creating a top-down approach to tracking key performance indicators (KPIs).

What are the benefits of strategic planning? ›

The benefits of strategic planning

Align everyone around a shared purpose. Proactively set objectives to help you get where you want to go. Define long-term goals, and then set shorter-term goals to support them. Assess your current situation and any opportunities—or threats.

Are the principles of strategic management applicable to the public sector? ›

Strategic management (SM) has become prominent on the agenda in several public organizations due to new public management (NPM) reforms. Nevertheless, there are few studies investigating how public organizations apply SM in practice and what tools are used. As a result, calls have been made for such studies.

What can the government do to support people in making plans? ›

The government supports innovative enterprise in a number of ways:
  • Increasing scope for finance. ...
  • Promoting cooperation between researchers and the private sector. ...
  • Reducing the regulatory burden on entrepreneurs. ...
  • Developing IT tools for entrepreneurs. ...
  • Helping entrepreneurs access networks.

What are five differences between public and private sectors? ›

Public sector organisations are owned, controlled and managed by the government or other state-run bodies. Private sector organisations are owned, controlled and managed by individuals, groups or business entities.

What are the objectives of public sector management? ›

A common way of understanding the general objectives of public sector organisations is the three Es: economy, efficiency and effectiveness. Economy represents value for money and delivering the required service on budget, on time and within other resource constraints.

What is public sector and private sector planning? ›

The private sector plays a vital role in planning since their projects are finalized at a faster pace. The public sector is run by the government. They usually have a limited budget to work with; therefore, it takes time to finalize the newer project developments.

What is strategic planning example? ›

One of the most commonly available examples of strategic planning, a corporate strategy is designed to increase revenue and brand reputation. From new products and quality enhancements to aggressive marketing and sales techniques, there are many ways to tap into growth opportunities.

What is an objective in strategic planning? ›

Objectives of strategic planning are detailed statements of direction that indicate what all is necessary and important in an organizational strategy. Specifically, these are clear goals that the organization strives to achieve in the near future.

What are the three most important characteristics of strategic planning? ›

Confirm Your Mission, Vision, and Values Statements

There's no better time to create or reaffirm your mission, vision, and values than during the strategic planning process. Mission, vision, and values form the foundation on which you'll build the strategic framework.

What are the elements of successful strategic planning? ›

Skipping these important steps can leave your organization without direction. Read ahead to learn more about the six vital elements of strategic planning: vision, mission, objectives, strategy, approach, and tactics.

What are the challenges of strategic planning? ›

Common challenges of strategic planning

There are four main challenges when it comes to strategic planning: lack of ownership, poor communication, lack of alignment, and slow adoption. It's important to understand what's at the core of these challenges before we dive into solutions.

What is strategy planning methods? ›

Strategic planning creates achievable goals through several factors, such as time management and resource allocation. Done well, strategic planning improves operations, provides focus, sets priorities and increases collaboration. It can guide and shape the future of an organization.

Videos

1. Turning Strategy into Action in the Public Sector
(Beyond20LLC)
2. The steps of the strategic planning process in under 15 minutes
(SME Strategy Consulting)
3. Strategic Planning in Government
(William P. Kittredge)
4. Shape your future: creating and delivering impactful public sector strategy
(Global Government Forum)
5. Lecture 2 Part 2b Strategy in the Public Sector
(Jonathan Fanning)
6. Strategic Management to Public Services Organisations
(OUresearch on YouTube)
Top Articles
Latest Posts
Article information

Author: Greg Kuvalis

Last Updated: 12/30/2022

Views: 5940

Rating: 4.4 / 5 (75 voted)

Reviews: 90% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Greg Kuvalis

Birthday: 1996-12-20

Address: 53157 Trantow Inlet, Townemouth, FL 92564-0267

Phone: +68218650356656

Job: IT Representative

Hobby: Knitting, Amateur radio, Skiing, Running, Mountain biking, Slacklining, Electronics

Introduction: My name is Greg Kuvalis, I am a witty, spotless, beautiful, charming, delightful, thankful, beautiful person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.